The verdict
Max Plath has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Max Plath leads by 16%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonKai Pearce-Paul16%of decided measures11measures wonMax Plath
Games played: 12 for Kai Pearce-Paul, 19 for Max Plath. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Kai Pearce-Paul |  Max Plath |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.33Better | 0.21 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.25Better | 0.05 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.33Better | 0.05 |
| Points per Game | 1.3Better | 0.8 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.08 | 0.37Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.83 | 2.16Better |
| Offloads per Game | 2.33Better | 0.00 |
| Possessions per Game | 12.2 | 56.9Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.7 | 48.3Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 68.2 | 79.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 69.2 | 79.8Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 24.6 | 30.6Better |
| Runs per Game | 8.8 | 9.2Better |
| Metres per Run | 7.72 | 8.71Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.79 | 9.34Better |
| Tackles per Game | 35.6Better | 33.9 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.4Better | 91.0 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06Better | 0.07 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.01Better |
| Games played | 12 | 19 |