The verdict
Kai Pearce-Paul has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Kai Pearce-Paul leads by 47%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
14measures wonKai Pearce-Paul47%of decided measures5measures wonMatty Nicholson
Games played: 12 for Kai Pearce-Paul, 6 for Matty Nicholson. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Kai Pearce-Paul |  Matty Nicholson |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.33Better | 0.17 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.25Better | 0.17 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.33Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 1.3Better | 0.7 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.08 | 0.33Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.83 | 1.00Better |
| Offloads per Game | 2.33Better | 0.33 |
| Possessions per Game | 12.2Better | 6.8 |
| Passes per Game | 2.7Better | 0.5 |
| Run Metres per Game | 68.2Better | 51.5 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 69.2Better | 51.5 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 24.6Better | 18.5 |
| Runs per Game | 8.8Better | 6.0 |
| Metres per Run | 7.72 | 8.58Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.79 | 8.10Better |
| Tackles per Game | 35.6Better | 26.8 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.4Better | 89.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06Better | 0.08 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.00Better |
| Games played | 12 | 6 |