The verdict
Mark Nawaqanitawase has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Mark Nawaqanitawase leads by 73%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
3measures wonJunior Tupou73%of decided measures19measures wonMark Nawaqanitawase
Games played: 7 for Junior Tupou, 19 for Mark Nawaqanitawase. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Junior Tupou |  Mark Nawaqanitawase |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.14 | 0.79Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.14 | 0.32Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.29 | 0.32Better |
| Points per Game | 0.6 | 3.2Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.57 | 0.74Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.71 | 3.21Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.43 | 1.21Better |
| Possessions per Game | 18.0 | 21.6Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.7 | 2.5Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 149.4 | 157.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 152.0 | 162.2Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 52.7 | 60.8Better |
| Runs per Game | 14.9 | 16.4Better |
| Metres per Run | 10.06Better | 9.61 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.50Better | 7.72 |
| Tackles per Game | 4.0 | 4.6Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 75.7 | 84.5Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.21 | 0.14Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06Better | 0.11 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 3.0 | 3.1Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 32.3 | 34.9Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.6 | 1.3Better |
| Games played | 7 | 19 |