The verdict
Junior Paulo has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Junior Paulo leads by 100%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
19measures wonJunior Paulo100%of decided measures0measures wonSimione Laiafi
Games played: 17 for Junior Paulo, 18 for Simione Laiafi. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Junior Paulo |  Simione Laiafi |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.06Better | 0.00 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.12Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.12Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.2Better | 0.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.06Better | 0.00 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.00Better | 0.44 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.82Better | 0.33 |
| Possessions per Game | 16.2Better | 5.4 |
| Passes per Game | 4.2Better | 0.1 |
| Run Metres per Game | 102.9Better | 42.1 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 102.9Better | 42.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 35.3Better | 15.6 |
| Runs per Game | 12.2Better | 5.1 |
| Metres per Run | 8.41Better | 8.32 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.06Better | 7.94 |
| Tackles per Game | 23.6Better | 11.9 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.3Better | 88.5 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.07Better | 0.10 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.04 |
| Games played | 17 | 18 |