The verdict
Naufahu Whyte has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Naufahu Whyte leads by 44%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
5measures wonJunior Paulo44%of decided measures13measures wonNaufahu Whyte
Games played: 17 for Junior Paulo, 23 for Naufahu Whyte. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Junior Paulo |  Naufahu Whyte |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.06Better | 0.00 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.12Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.12Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.2Better | 0.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.06 | 0.09Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.00 | 2.87Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.82 | 1.13Better |
| Possessions per Game | 16.2 | 17.8Better |
| Passes per Game | 4.2Better | 1.7 |
| Run Metres per Game | 102.9 | 162.7Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 102.9 | 162.7Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 35.3 | 70.6Better |
| Runs per Game | 12.2 | 16.1Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.41 | 10.12Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.06 | 10.37Better |
| Tackles per Game | 23.6 | 25.7Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.3 | 92.8Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.07 | 0.05Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Games played | 17 | 23 |