The verdict
Josh King has the edge
Across 16 rate and efficiency measures, Josh King leads by 100%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
16measures wonJosh King100%of decided measures0measures wonSam Tuivaiti
Games played: 24 for Josh King, 15 for Sam Tuivaiti. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Josh King |  Sam Tuivaiti |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.08Better | 0.00 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.3Better | 0.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.08Better | 0.00 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.71Better | 0.53 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.58Better | 0.13 |
| Possessions per Game | 12.3Better | 10.1 |
| Passes per Game | 1.2Better | 0.2 |
| Run Metres per Game | 90.2Better | 75.2 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 91.8Better | 75.2 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 31.5Better | 25.4 |
| Runs per Game | 10.6Better | 9.7 |
| Metres per Run | 8.49Better | 7.78 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.27Better | 7.23 |
| Tackles per Game | 32.3Better | 23.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.1Better | 91.0 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.03 |
| Games played | 24 | 15 |