The verdict
Matt Burton has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Matt Burton leads by 70%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
3measures wonJosh Feledy70%of decided measures17measures wonMatt Burton
Games played: 18 for Josh Feledy, 23 for Matt Burton. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Josh Feledy |  Matt Burton |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.28 | 0.39Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.11 | 0.35Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.11 | 0.61Better |
| Points per Game | 1.1 | 3.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.22 | 0.57Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.06 | 2.96Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.11 | 0.61Better |
| Possessions per Game | 7.3 | 36.7Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.9 | 19.2Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 43.8 | 122.3Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 45.0 | 310.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 16.0 | 42.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 5.3 | 13.0Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.22 | 9.44Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.00Better | 7.44 |
| Tackles per Game | 6.0 | 16.0Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 83.1Better | 81.4 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13Better | 0.15 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 79.2 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05 | 0.02Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.1 | 0.2Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Games played | 18 | 23 |