The verdict
Naufahu Whyte has the edge
Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Naufahu Whyte leads by 18%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
7measures wonJoseph Tapine18%of decided measures10measures wonNaufahu Whyte
Games played: 24 for Joseph Tapine, 23 for Naufahu Whyte. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Joseph Tapine |  Naufahu Whyte |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.04Better | 0.00 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.08Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.2Better | 0.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.04 | 0.09Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.13 | 2.87Better |
| Offloads per Game | 1.75Better | 1.13 |
| Possessions per Game | 18.3Better | 17.8 |
| Passes per Game | 3.9Better | 1.7 |
| Run Metres per Game | 130.4 | 162.7Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 130.4 | 162.7Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 49.3 | 70.6Better |
| Runs per Game | 15.0 | 16.1Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.72 | 10.12Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.88 | 10.37Better |
| Tackles per Game | 31.4Better | 25.7 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.5 | 92.8Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06 | 0.05Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Games played | 24 | 23 |