The verdict
Jordan Riki has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Jordan Riki leads by 16%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonJordan Riki16%of decided measures8measures wonZac Hosking
Games played: 22 for Jordan Riki, 21 for Zac Hosking. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jordan Riki |  Zac Hosking |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.23 | 0.24Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.05Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.09Better | 0.05 |
| Points per Game | 0.9 | 1.0Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.27Better | 0.19 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.45Better | 0.86 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.41 | 0.90Better |
| Possessions per Game | 13.4Better | 13.1 |
| Passes per Game | 0.9 | 1.7Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 97.4Better | 89.1 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 99.6Better | 89.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 42.2Better | 31.3 |
| Runs per Game | 11.4Better | 10.9 |
| Metres per Run | 8.54Better | 8.17 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.73Better | 8.53 |
| Tackles per Game | 35.2Better | 33.2 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.9 | 93.3Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06 | 0.04Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05 | 0.02Better |
| Games played | 22 | 21 |