The verdict
Simi Sasagi has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Simi Sasagi leads by 40%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
6measures wonJojo Fifita40%of decided measures14measures wonSimi Sasagi
Games played: 20 for Jojo Fifita, 16 for Simi Sasagi. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jojo Fifita |  Simi Sasagi |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.40 | 0.44Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.20 | 0.75Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.10 | 0.69Better |
| Points per Game | 1.6 | 1.8Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.55 | 0.56Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.55 | 4.31Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.75 | 1.31Better |
| Possessions per Game | 16.8 | 21.0Better |
| Passes per Game | 4.8Better | 3.6 |
| Run Metres per Game | 108.2 | 166.6Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 110.6 | 172.8Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 40.3 | 64.9Better |
| Runs per Game | 10.7 | 17.5Better |
| Metres per Run | 10.15Better | 9.52 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.41 | 9.66Better |
| Tackles per Game | 17.9Better | 15.6 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 85.4Better | 81.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.11Better | 0.16 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.01Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2Better | 0.1 |
| Games played | 20 | 16 |