The verdict
Jojo Fifita has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Jojo Fifita leads by 5%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonJojo Fifita5%of decided measures10measures wonMatt Timoko
Games played: 20 for Jojo Fifita, 20 for Matt Timoko. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jojo Fifita |  Matt Timoko |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.40Better | 0.30 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.20Better | 0.10 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.10 | 0.20Better |
| Points per Game | 1.6Better | 1.2 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.55Better | 0.45 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.55 | 3.05Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.75 | 1.15Better |
| Possessions per Game | 16.8 | 18.1Better |
| Passes per Game | 4.8Better | 3.3 |
| Run Metres per Game | 108.2 | 140.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 110.6 | 141.0Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 40.3 | 52.0Better |
| Runs per Game | 10.7 | 15.0Better |
| Metres per Run | 10.15Better | 9.38 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.41 | 8.62Better |
| Tackles per Game | 17.9Better | 10.7 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 85.4Better | 83.2 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.11Better | 0.14 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.03Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.3Better | 0.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2Better | 0.0 |
| Games played | 20 | 20 |