The verdict
Jojo Fifita has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Jojo Fifita leads by 52%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
16measures wonJojo Fifita52%of decided measures5measures wonLuke Garner
Games played: 20 for Jojo Fifita, 18 for Luke Garner. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jojo Fifita |  Luke Garner |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.40Better | 0.17 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.20Better | 0.06 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.10Better | 0.06 |
| Points per Game | 1.6Better | 0.7 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.55Better | 0.22 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.55Better | 1.28 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.75Better | 0.28 |
| Possessions per Game | 16.8Better | 8.9 |
| Passes per Game | 4.8Better | 1.4 |
| Run Metres per Game | 108.2Better | 65.6 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 110.6Better | 67.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 40.3Better | 26.6 |
| Runs per Game | 10.7Better | 7.3 |
| Metres per Run | 10.15Better | 9.02 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.41 | 9.41Better |
| Tackles per Game | 17.9 | 20.7Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 85.4 | 89.6Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.11 | 0.08Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.03Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.3Better | 0.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2Better | 0.1 |
| Games played | 20 | 18 |