The verdict
Jojo Fifita has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Jojo Fifita leads by 30%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonJojo Fifita30%of decided measures7measures wonJordan Samrani
Games played: 20 for Jojo Fifita, 16 for Jordan Samrani. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.40 | 0.50Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.20Better | 0.06 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.10Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 1.6 | 2.0Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.55Better | 0.44 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.55Better | 1.69 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.75 | 1.06Better |
| Possessions per Game | 16.8 | 17.6Better |
| Passes per Game | 4.8Better | 2.4 |
| Run Metres per Game | 108.2 | 119.3Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 110.6 | 119.3Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 40.3Better | 39.6 |
| Runs per Game | 10.7 | 13.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 10.15Better | 8.56 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.41Better | 7.61 |
| Tackles per Game | 17.9Better | 12.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 85.4Better | 82.1 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.11Better | 0.15 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.3Better | 0.1 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Games played | 20 | 16 |