2026 NRL player comparison

Jock MaddenvsLuke Metcalf

Wests Tigers · Halfback versus Warriors · Halfback

Compare another player

The verdict

Jock Madden has the edge

Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Jock Madden leads by 20%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

12measures wonJock Madden20%of decided measures8measures wonLuke Metcalf

Games played: 18 for Jock Madden, 10 for Luke Metcalf. Compared positions: Halfback.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricWests Tigers logoJock MaddenWarriors logoLuke Metcalf
Tries per Game0.060.20Better
Try Assists per Game0.28Better0.10
Line Break Assists per Game0.44Better0.20
Points per Game3.8Better2.0
Line Breaks per Game0.060.10Better
Tackle Breaks per Game0.170.50Better
Offloads per Game0.000.00
Possessions per Game44.7Better13.5
Passes per Game31.4Better8.8
Run Metres per Game35.6Better19.3
Metres Gained per Game377.6Better113.1
Post-Contact Metres per Game4.44.7Better
Runs per Game4.9Better2.1
Metres per Run7.199.19Better
Metres per Hit-Up
Tackles per Game15.8Better5.8
Tackle Efficiency85.386.6Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.150.10Better
Conversion Accuracy66.775.0Better
Penalty Goal Accuracy100.0
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.01Better0.02
Kicks per Game10.4Better2.8
Kick Metres per Game342.2Better94.0
Games played1810