2026 NRL player comparison

Jethro RinakamavsZac Laybutt

Bulldogs · Wing versus Cowboys · Wing

Compare another player

The verdict

Jethro Rinakama has the edge

Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Jethro Rinakama leads by 36%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

15measures wonJethro Rinakama36%of decided measures7measures wonZac Laybutt

Games played: 15 for Jethro Rinakama, 21 for Zac Laybutt. Compared positions: Wing.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricBulldogs logoJethro RinakamaCowboys logoZac Laybutt
Tries per Game0.47Better0.10
Try Assists per Game0.000.10Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.000.29Better
Points per Game1.9Better0.4
Line Breaks per Game0.73Better0.24
Tackle Breaks per Game2.67Better1.05
Offloads per Game0.33Better0.19
Possessions per Game14.514.6Better
Passes per Game1.14.2Better
Run Metres per Game110.7Better84.0
Metres Gained per Game110.7Better87.1
Post-Contact Metres per Game37.3Better26.1
Runs per Game12.0Better10.0
Metres per Run9.23Better8.44
Metres per Hit-Up7.488.22Better
Tackles per Game3.69.5Better
Tackle Efficiency87.1Better81.6
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.11Better0.17
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.100.07Better
Kick Returns per Game1.7Better0.7
Kick Return Metres per Game19.1Better6.5
Bombs Caught per Game1.0Better0.3
Games played1521