The verdict
Jermaine McEwen has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Jermaine McEwen leads by 11%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
10measures wonJermaine McEwen11%of decided measures8measures wonNoah Martin
Games played: 20 for Jermaine McEwen, 11 for Noah Martin. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jermaine McEwen |  Noah Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.10 | 0.36Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.15Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.10Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.4 | 1.5Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.30 | 0.55Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.75 | 2.18Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.20Better | 0.18 |
| Possessions per Game | 14.4Better | 10.6 |
| Passes per Game | 2.3 | 2.3 |
| Run Metres per Game | 94.5Better | 70.0 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 97.9Better | 70.0 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 33.9Better | 26.8 |
| Runs per Game | 11.6Better | 8.1 |
| Metres per Run | 8.18 | 8.65Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.30Better | 7.80 |
| Tackles per Game | 33.8 | 39.6Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 89.3 | 90.6Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.09 | 0.08Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05Better | 0.06 |
| Games played | 20 | 11 |