The verdict
Jermaine McEwen has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Jermaine McEwen leads by 26%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonJermaine McEwen26%of decided measures7measures wonLiam Martin
Games played: 20 for Jermaine McEwen, 16 for Liam Martin. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jermaine McEwen |  Liam Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.10 | 0.44Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.15Better | 0.13 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.10 | 0.25Better |
| Points per Game | 0.4 | 1.8Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.30 | 0.44Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.75 | 1.94Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.20 | 1.06Better |
| Possessions per Game | 14.4Better | 13.4 |
| Passes per Game | 2.3 | 2.5Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 94.5Better | 82.2 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 97.9Better | 82.2 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 33.9Better | 29.3 |
| Runs per Game | 11.6Better | 10.4 |
| Metres per Run | 8.18Better | 7.92 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.30Better | 7.82 |
| Tackles per Game | 33.8Better | 29.8 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 89.3Better | 87.5 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.09Better | 0.10 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05Better | 0.08 |
| Games played | 20 | 16 |