The verdict
Jermaine McEwen has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Jermaine McEwen leads by 5%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
10measures wonJermaine McEwen5%of decided measures9measures wonKurt Capewell
Games played: 20 for Jermaine McEwen, 13 for Kurt Capewell. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jermaine McEwen |  Kurt Capewell |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.10 | 0.15Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.15 | 0.23Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.10 | 0.15Better |
| Points per Game | 0.4 | 0.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.30Better | 0.23 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.75Better | 1.00 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.20 | 0.62Better |
| Possessions per Game | 14.4Better | 13.0 |
| Passes per Game | 2.3 | 3.0Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 94.5Better | 76.2 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 97.9Better | 80.5 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 33.9Better | 29.2 |
| Runs per Game | 11.6Better | 9.2 |
| Metres per Run | 8.18 | 8.32Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.30 | 8.67Better |
| Tackles per Game | 33.8Better | 29.8 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 89.3Better | 86.6 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.09Better | 0.11 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05 | 0.04Better |
| Games played | 20 | 13 |