The verdict
Jermaine McEwen has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Jermaine McEwen leads by 16%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonJermaine McEwen16%of decided measures8measures wonJohn Bateman
Games played: 20 for Jermaine McEwen, 7 for John Bateman. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jermaine McEwen |  John Bateman |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.10 | 0.14Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.15Better | 0.14 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.10Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.4 | 0.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.30Better | 0.29 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.75Better | 0.57 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.20 | 0.43Better |
| Possessions per Game | 14.4Better | 7.4 |
| Passes per Game | 2.3Better | 0.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 94.5Better | 54.3 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 97.9Better | 55.7 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 33.9Better | 17.7 |
| Runs per Game | 11.6Better | 6.1 |
| Metres per Run | 8.18 | 8.84Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.30 | 8.94Better |
| Tackles per Game | 33.8Better | 17.6 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 89.3 | 90.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.09 | 0.08Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05 | 0.04Better |
| Games played | 20 | 7 |