The verdict
Max Plath has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Max Plath leads by 5%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonJeremiah Nanai5%of decided measures10measures wonMax Plath
Games played: 9 for Jeremiah Nanai, 19 for Max Plath. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jeremiah Nanai |  Max Plath |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.44Better | 0.21 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.05Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.05Better |
| Points per Game | 1.8Better | 0.8 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.33 | 0.37Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.11 | 2.16Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.33Better | 0.00 |
| Possessions per Game | 10.9 | 56.9Better |
| Passes per Game | 0.8 | 48.3Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 98.8Better | 79.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 98.8Better | 79.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 42.7Better | 30.6 |
| Runs per Game | 9.9Better | 9.2 |
| Metres per Run | 9.99Better | 8.71 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 10.97Better | 9.34 |
| Tackles per Game | 27.1 | 33.9Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.0 | 91.0Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08 | 0.07Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.01Better |
| Games played | 9 | 19 |