The verdict
Jeremiah Nanai has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Jeremiah Nanai leads by 26%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonJeremiah Nanai26%of decided measures7measures wonKurt Capewell
Games played: 9 for Jeremiah Nanai, 13 for Kurt Capewell. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jeremiah Nanai |  Kurt Capewell |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.44Better | 0.15 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.23Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.15Better |
| Points per Game | 1.8Better | 0.6 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.33Better | 0.23 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.11Better | 1.00 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.33 | 0.62Better |
| Possessions per Game | 10.9 | 13.0Better |
| Passes per Game | 0.8 | 3.0Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 98.8Better | 76.2 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 98.8Better | 80.5 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 42.7Better | 29.2 |
| Runs per Game | 9.9Better | 9.2 |
| Metres per Run | 9.99Better | 8.32 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 10.97Better | 8.67 |
| Tackles per Game | 27.1 | 29.8Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.0Better | 86.6 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08Better | 0.11 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.04Better |
| Games played | 9 | 13 |