The verdict
Jeremiah Nanai has the edge
Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Jeremiah Nanai leads by 41%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonJeremiah Nanai41%of decided measures5measures wonJohn Bateman
Games played: 9 for Jeremiah Nanai, 7 for John Bateman. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jeremiah Nanai | John Bateman |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.44Better | 0.14 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.14Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 1.8Better | 0.6 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.33Better | 0.29 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.11Better | 0.57 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.33 | 0.43Better |
| Possessions per Game | 10.9Better | 7.4 |
| Passes per Game | 0.8 | 0.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 98.8Better | 54.3 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 98.8Better | 55.7 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 42.7Better | 17.7 |
| Runs per Game | 9.9Better | 6.1 |
| Metres per Run | 9.99Better | 8.84 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 10.97Better | 8.94 |
| Tackles per Game | 27.1Better | 17.6 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.0 | 90.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.04Better |
| Games played | 9 | 7 |