The verdict
Will Warbrick has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Will Warbrick leads by 71%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
3measures wonJensen Taumoepeau71%of decided measures18measures wonWill Warbrick
Games played: 7 for Jensen Taumoepeau, 18 for Will Warbrick. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.00 | 0.89Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.06Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.0 | 3.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.14 | 0.61Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.00 | 3.00Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.14 | 0.78Better |
| Possessions per Game | 18.0 | 19.7Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.9Better | 1.6 |
| Run Metres per Game | 116.6 | 137.9Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 121.6 | 137.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 36.3 | 50.4Better |
| Runs per Game | 14.3 | 14.7Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.16 | 9.37Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.09 | 8.65Better |
| Tackles per Game | 2.7 | 5.4Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 76.0 | 78.9Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.11Better | 0.20 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.08Better | 0.09 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.6 | 1.5Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 13.6 | 18.3Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.1 | 1.6Better |
| Games played | 7 | 18 |