The verdict
Will Penisini has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Will Penisini leads by 70%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
3measures wonJaylan De Groot70%of decided measures17measures wonWill Penisini
Games played: 17 for Jaylan De Groot, 12 for Will Penisini. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jaylan De Groot |  Will Penisini |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.12 | 0.33Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.06 | 0.17Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.12 | 0.42Better |
| Points per Game | 0.5 | 1.3Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.06 | 0.33Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.53 | 3.50Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.24 | 1.00Better |
| Possessions per Game | 8.5 | 17.2Better |
| Passes per Game | 3.4Better | 2.4 |
| Run Metres per Game | 44.0 | 141.3Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 44.9 | 141.3Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 13.1 | 54.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 4.6 | 14.5Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.47 | 9.75Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.31 | 9.34Better |
| Tackles per Game | 5.1 | 12.3Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 80.6 | 80.9Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.21 | 0.16Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.1Better | 0.0 |
| Games played | 17 | 12 |