The verdict
Jaxon Purdue has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Jaxon Purdue leads by 10%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonJaxon Purdue10%of decided measures9measures wonWill Penisini
Games played: 24 for Jaxon Purdue, 12 for Will Penisini. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jaxon Purdue |  Will Penisini |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.38Better | 0.33 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.46Better | 0.17 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.46Better | 0.42 |
| Points per Game | 1.5Better | 1.3 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.54Better | 0.33 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.21 | 3.50Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.71 | 1.00Better |
| Possessions per Game | 28.6Better | 17.2 |
| Passes per Game | 15.9Better | 2.4 |
| Run Metres per Game | 110.5 | 141.3Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 123.1 | 141.3Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 37.3 | 54.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 12.4 | 14.5Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.93 | 9.75Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.67 | 9.34Better |
| Tackles per Game | 17.1Better | 12.3 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 82.2Better | 80.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.14Better | 0.16 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2 | 0.3Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Games played | 24 | 12 |