The verdict
Tom Chester has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Tom Chester leads by 5%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonJaxon Purdue5%of decided measures10measures wonTom Chester
Games played: 24 for Jaxon Purdue, 23 for Tom Chester. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jaxon Purdue | Tom Chester |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.38 | 0.48Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.46Better | 0.09 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.46Better | 0.13 |
| Points per Game | 1.5 | 1.9Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.54 | 0.87Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.21 | 3.39Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.71Better | 0.52 |
| Possessions per Game | 28.6Better | 20.7 |
| Passes per Game | 15.9Better | 4.4 |
| Run Metres per Game | 110.5 | 158.7Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 123.1 | 160.7Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 37.3 | 58.9Better |
| Runs per Game | 12.4 | 16.0Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.93 | 9.92Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.67 | 8.65Better |
| Tackles per Game | 17.1Better | 14.5 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 82.2Better | 76.4 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.14Better | 0.23 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Games played | 24 | 23 |