The verdict
Jaxon Purdue has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Jaxon Purdue leads by 70%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
17measures wonJaxon Purdue70%of decided measures3measures wonJosh Feledy
Games played: 24 for Jaxon Purdue, 18 for Josh Feledy. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jaxon Purdue |  Josh Feledy |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.38Better | 0.28 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.46Better | 0.11 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.46Better | 0.11 |
| Points per Game | 1.5Better | 1.1 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.54Better | 0.22 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.21Better | 1.06 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.71Better | 0.11 |
| Possessions per Game | 28.6Better | 7.3 |
| Passes per Game | 15.9Better | 1.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 110.5Better | 43.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 123.1Better | 45.0 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 37.3Better | 16.0 |
| Runs per Game | 12.4Better | 5.3 |
| Metres per Run | 8.93Better | 8.22 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.67 | 8.00Better |
| Tackles per Game | 17.1Better | 6.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 82.2 | 83.1Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.14 | 0.13Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2Better | 0.1 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Games played | 24 | 18 |