The verdict
James Tedesco has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, James Tedesco leads by 18%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonJames Tedesco18%of decided measures9measures wonScott Drinkwater
Games played: 17 for James Tedesco, 24 for Scott Drinkwater. Compared positions: Fullback.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  James Tedesco |  Scott Drinkwater |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.65Better | 0.42 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.82 | 0.96Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.53 | 1.13Better |
| Points per Game | 2.6 | 4.2Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.88Better | 0.42 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.82Better | 3.00 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.59Better | 1.13 |
| Possessions per Game | 35.1 | 49.3Better |
| Passes per Game | 17.6 | 30.3Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 192.2Better | 140.2 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 201.7 | 258.0Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 52.9Better | 31.8 |
| Runs per Game | 19.0Better | 16.7 |
| Metres per Run | 10.12Better | 8.39 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.00Better | 5.00 |
| Tackles per Game | 3.3 | 5.3Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 76.7Better | 69.8 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.23Better | 0.36 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 92.6 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.03 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 4.6 | 5.0Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 50.5Better | 47.6 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 1.2 | 1.9Better |
| Games played | 17 | 24 |