The verdict
James Fisher-Harris has the edge
Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, James Fisher-Harris leads by 18%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
10measures wonJames Fisher-Harris18%of decided measures7measures wonToby Couchman
Games played: 21 for James Fisher-Harris, 22 for Toby Couchman. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  James Fisher-Harris |  Toby Couchman |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.14Better | 0.00 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.10Better | 0.05 |
| Points per Game | 0.6Better | 0.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.14Better | 0.00 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.24Better | 1.23 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.62 | 1.00Better |
| Possessions per Game | 19.2Better | 15.7 |
| Passes per Game | 3.4Better | 1.1 |
| Run Metres per Game | 135.9Better | 132.4 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 135.9Better | 132.4 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 45.3 | 49.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 16.2Better | 14.4 |
| Metres per Run | 8.37 | 9.19Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.81 | 9.34Better |
| Tackles per Game | 32.0 | 40.5Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.3 | 95.1Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08 | 0.03Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Games played | 21 | 22 |