The verdict
Mitchell Barnett has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Mitchell Barnett leads by 33%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
6measures wonJames Fisher-Harris33%of decided measures12measures wonMitchell Barnett
Games played: 21 for James Fisher-Harris, 15 for Mitchell Barnett. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  James Fisher-Harris | Mitchell Barnett |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.14Better | 0.07 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.05 | 0.20Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.10 | 0.13Better |
| Points per Game | 0.6Better | 0.3 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.14Better | 0.07 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.24 | 1.87Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.62Better | 0.53 |
| Possessions per Game | 19.2 | 19.5Better |
| Passes per Game | 3.4Better | 2.7 |
| Run Metres per Game | 135.9 | 149.0Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 135.9 | 149.5Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 45.3 | 52.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 16.2 | 16.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.37 | 8.83Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.81 | 8.61Better |
| Tackles per Game | 32.0Better | 27.3 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.3 | 90.5Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08 | 0.06Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Games played | 21 | 15 |