The verdict
Jake Clifford has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Jake Clifford leads by 70%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
17measures wonJake Clifford70%of decided measures3measures wonLuke Hanson
Games played: 24 for Jake Clifford, 7 for Luke Hanson. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jake Clifford |  Luke Hanson |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.38Better | 0.14 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.58Better | 0.29 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.50Better | 0.43 |
| Points per Game | 6.0Better | 0.7 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.46Better | 0.00 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.79Better | 0.71 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.75Better | 0.00 |
| Possessions per Game | 36.3Better | 12.6 |
| Passes per Game | 21.5Better | 9.7 |
| Run Metres per Game | 55.0Better | 16.4 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 403.2Better | 35.9 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 18.3Better | 5.3 |
| Runs per Game | 6.5Better | 2.3 |
| Metres per Run | 8.41Better | 7.19 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 4.00 | – |
| Tackles per Game | 15.2Better | 8.4 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 82.5 | 86.8Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.15 | 0.03Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | 65.8 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03 | 0.01Better |
| Kicks per Game | 8.3Better | 0.7 |
| Kick Metres per Game | 348.0Better | 19.4 |
| Games played | 24 | 7 |