The verdict
Jeremy Marshall-King has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Jeremy Marshall-King leads by 50%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
5measures wonJacob Liddle50%of decided measures15measures wonJeremy Marshall-King
Games played: 14 for Jacob Liddle, 16 for Jeremy Marshall-King. Compared positions: Hooker.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jacob Liddle |  Jeremy Marshall-King |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.14 | 0.19Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.06Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.14Better | 0.13 |
| Points per Game | 0.6 | 0.8Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.14 | 0.31Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.29 | 0.75Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.57Better | 0.50 |
| Possessions per Game | 60.3 | 94.9Better |
| Passes per Game | 57.3 | 91.1Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 32.0 | 42.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 33.4 | 42.8Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 8.3 | 14.1Better |
| Runs per Game | 3.1 | 4.5Better |
| Metres per Run | 10.42Better | 9.50 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | – |
| Tackles per Game | 26.4 | 38.6Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 94.6Better | 93.6 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.03Better | 0.04 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01 | 0.00Better |
| Dummy-Half Runs per Game | 2.1 | 3.9Better |
| Dummy-Half Metres per Game | 20.4 | 38.1Better |
| Games played | 14 | 16 |