The verdict
Tyson Frizell has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Tyson Frizell leads by 26%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
7measures wonJacob Laban26%of decided measures12measures wonTyson Frizell
Games played: 24 for Jacob Laban, 21 for Tyson Frizell. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jacob Laban |  Tyson Frizell |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.33Better | 0.10 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.13Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.04 | 0.05Better |
| Points per Game | 1.3Better | 0.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.46Better | 0.05 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.21Better | 0.76 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.50 | 0.81Better |
| Possessions per Game | 11.4Better | 11.2 |
| Passes per Game | 1.9 | 2.2Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 73.6 | 80.5Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 75.0 | 81.1Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 26.5 | 31.1Better |
| Runs per Game | 8.7 | 8.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.45 | 9.04Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.81 | 9.48Better |
| Tackles per Game | 27.9Better | 24.4 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 89.9 | 93.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08 | 0.05Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.08 | 0.02Better |
| Games played | 24 | 21 |