The verdict
Kai Pearce-Paul has the edge
Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Kai Pearce-Paul leads by 18%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
7measures wonJacob Laban18%of decided measures10measures wonKai Pearce-Paul
Games played: 24 for Jacob Laban, 12 for Kai Pearce-Paul. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jacob Laban |  Kai Pearce-Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.13 | 0.25Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.04 | 0.33Better |
| Points per Game | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.46Better | 0.08 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.21Better | 0.83 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.50 | 2.33Better |
| Possessions per Game | 11.4 | 12.2Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.9 | 2.7Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 73.6Better | 68.2 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 75.0Better | 69.2 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 26.5Better | 24.6 |
| Runs per Game | 8.7 | 8.8Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.45Better | 7.72 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.81Better | 7.79 |
| Tackles per Game | 27.9 | 35.6Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 89.9 | 91.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08 | 0.06Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.08 | 0.04Better |
| Games played | 24 | 12 |