The verdict
Jermaine McEwen has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Jermaine McEwen leads by 16%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonJacob Laban16%of decided measures11measures wonJermaine McEwen
Games played: 24 for Jacob Laban, 20 for Jermaine McEwen. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jacob Laban |  Jermaine McEwen |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.33Better | 0.10 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.13 | 0.15Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.04 | 0.10Better |
| Points per Game | 1.3Better | 0.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.46Better | 0.30 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.21Better | 1.75 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.50Better | 0.20 |
| Possessions per Game | 11.4 | 14.4Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.9 | 2.3Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 73.6 | 94.5Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 75.0 | 97.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 26.5 | 33.9Better |
| Runs per Game | 8.7 | 11.6Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.45Better | 8.18 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.81 | 8.30Better |
| Tackles per Game | 27.9 | 33.8Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 89.9Better | 89.3 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08Better | 0.09 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.08 | 0.05Better |
| Games played | 24 | 20 |