The verdict
Jackson Ford has the edge
Across 16 rate and efficiency measures, Jackson Ford leads by 63%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonJackson Ford63%of decided measures3measures wonTevita Tatola
Games played: 14 for Jackson Ford, 24 for Tevita Tatola. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jackson Ford |  Tevita Tatola |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.29Better | 0.08 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 1.3Better | 0.3 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.43Better | 0.04 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.29Better | 0.42 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.64Better | 0.04 |
| Possessions per Game | 19.0Better | 14.2 |
| Passes per Game | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Run Metres per Game | 153.9Better | 106.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 154.1Better | 106.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 63.5Better | 39.4 |
| Runs per Game | 17.5Better | 12.8 |
| Metres per Run | 8.79Better | 8.35 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.11Better | 8.05 |
| Tackles per Game | 43.6Better | 26.7 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.1 | 91.6Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08 | 0.05Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03 | 0.01Better |
| Games played | 14 | 24 |