The verdict
Jackson Ford has the edge
Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Jackson Ford leads by 100%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
17measures wonJackson Ford100%of decided measures0measures wonSimione Laiafi
Games played: 14 for Jackson Ford, 18 for Simione Laiafi. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jackson Ford |  Simione Laiafi |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.29Better | 0.00 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 1.3Better | 0.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.43Better | 0.00 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.29Better | 0.44 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.64Better | 0.33 |
| Possessions per Game | 19.0Better | 5.4 |
| Passes per Game | 1.1Better | 0.1 |
| Run Metres per Game | 153.9Better | 42.1 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 154.1Better | 42.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 63.5Better | 15.6 |
| Runs per Game | 17.5Better | 5.1 |
| Metres per Run | 8.79Better | 8.32 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.11Better | 7.94 |
| Tackles per Game | 43.6Better | 11.9 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.1Better | 88.5 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08Better | 0.10 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.04 |
| Games played | 14 | 18 |