The verdict
Jackson Ford has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Jackson Ford leads by 33%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonJackson Ford33%of decided measures6measures wonJames Fisher-Harris
Games played: 14 for Jackson Ford, 21 for James Fisher-Harris. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jackson Ford | James Fisher-Harris |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.29Better | 0.14 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.05Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.10Better |
| Points per Game | 1.3Better | 0.6 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.43Better | 0.14 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.29Better | 1.24 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.64Better | 0.62 |
| Possessions per Game | 19.0 | 19.2Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.1 | 3.4Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 153.9Better | 135.9 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 154.1Better | 135.9 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 63.5Better | 45.3 |
| Runs per Game | 17.5Better | 16.2 |
| Metres per Run | 8.79Better | 8.37 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.11Better | 7.81 |
| Tackles per Game | 43.6Better | 32.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.1 | 90.3Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03 | 0.01Better |
| Games played | 14 | 21 |