The verdict
Jack Williams has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Jack Williams leads by 22%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonJack Williams22%of decided measures7measures wonJermaine McEwen
Games played: 24 for Jack Williams, 20 for Jermaine McEwen. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jack Williams |  Jermaine McEwen |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.08 | 0.10Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.13 | 0.15Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.08 | 0.10Better |
| Points per Game | 0.3 | 0.4Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.25 | 0.30Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.25Better | 1.75 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.42Better | 0.20 |
| Possessions per Game | 14.2 | 14.4Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.6 | 2.3Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 108.1Better | 94.5 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 108.1Better | 97.9 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 40.4Better | 33.9 |
| Runs per Game | 12.5Better | 11.6 |
| Metres per Run | 8.68Better | 8.18 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.84Better | 8.30 |
| Tackles per Game | 39.5Better | 33.8 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 89.3 | 89.3 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08Better | 0.09 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.05 |
| Games played | 24 | 20 |