The verdict
Paul Alamoti has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Paul Alamoti leads by 30%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
7measures wonJack Howarth30%of decided measures13measures wonPaul Alamoti
Games played: 17 for Jack Howarth, 21 for Paul Alamoti. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jack Howarth |  Paul Alamoti |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.35Better | 0.19 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.18Better | 0.14 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.29 | 0.33Better |
| Points per Game | 1.4 | 2.0Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.29 | 0.52Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.59Better | 3.19 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.59 | 1.29Better |
| Possessions per Game | 17.0 | 17.0 |
| Passes per Game | 2.0 | 3.0Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 126.4 | 129.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 128.4 | 132.0Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 44.6 | 48.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 14.9Better | 13.8 |
| Metres per Run | 8.49 | 9.40Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.28 | 9.25Better |
| Tackles per Game | 11.6 | 13.0Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 79.2Better | 78.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.16Better | 0.22 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 86.7 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.06 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.1 | 0.5Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.2Better |
| Games played | 17 | 21 |