The verdict
Jack Howarth has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Jack Howarth leads by 79%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
17measures wonJack Howarth79%of decided measures2measures wonJosh Feledy
Games played: 17 for Jack Howarth, 18 for Josh Feledy. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jack Howarth |  Josh Feledy |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.35Better | 0.28 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.18Better | 0.11 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.29Better | 0.11 |
| Points per Game | 1.4Better | 1.1 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.29Better | 0.22 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.59Better | 1.06 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.59Better | 0.11 |
| Possessions per Game | 17.0Better | 7.3 |
| Passes per Game | 2.0Better | 1.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 126.4Better | 43.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 128.4Better | 45.0 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 44.6Better | 16.0 |
| Runs per Game | 14.9Better | 5.3 |
| Metres per Run | 8.49Better | 8.22 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.28Better | 8.00 |
| Tackles per Game | 11.6Better | 6.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 79.2 | 83.1Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.16 | 0.13Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Games played | 17 | 18 |