The verdict
Jojo Fifita has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Jojo Fifita leads by 24%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonJack Howarth24%of decided measures13measures wonJojo Fifita
Games played: 17 for Jack Howarth, 20 for Jojo Fifita. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.35 | 0.40Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.18 | 0.20Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.29Better | 0.10 |
| Points per Game | 1.4 | 1.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.29 | 0.55Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.59Better | 2.55 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.59 | 0.75Better |
| Possessions per Game | 17.0Better | 16.8 |
| Passes per Game | 2.0 | 4.8Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 126.4Better | 108.2 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 128.4Better | 110.6 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 44.6Better | 40.3 |
| Runs per Game | 14.9Better | 10.7 |
| Metres per Run | 8.49 | 10.15Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.28 | 8.41Better |
| Tackles per Game | 11.6 | 17.9Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 79.2 | 85.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.16 | 0.11Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.04 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.1 | 0.3Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.2Better |
| Games played | 17 | 20 |