The verdict
Jack Bostock has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Jack Bostock leads by 52%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
16measures wonJack Bostock52%of decided measures5measures wonRoger Tuivasa-Sheck
Games played: 14 for Jack Bostock, 10 for Roger Tuivasa-Sheck. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jack Bostock |  Roger Tuivasa-Sheck |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.36Better | 0.20 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.79Better | 0.50 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.79Better | 0.40 |
| Points per Game | 1.4Better | 1.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.36 | 0.40Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.57Better | 2.10 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.07Better | 0.30 |
| Possessions per Game | 24.0Better | 20.8 |
| Passes per Game | 5.3Better | 4.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 144.5Better | 139.7 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 148.9Better | 144.7 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 46.4 | 46.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 17.3Better | 15.3 |
| Metres per Run | 8.36 | 9.13Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.38Better | 7.75 |
| Tackles per Game | 16.7Better | 6.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 84.8Better | 75.0 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.10Better | 0.25 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.08 | 0.06Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.3 | 1.1Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 1.0Better | 0.2 |
| Games played | 14 | 10 |