The verdict
Jack Bostock has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Jack Bostock leads by 14%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonJack Bostock14%of decided measures9measures wonPaul Alamoti
Games played: 14 for Jack Bostock, 21 for Paul Alamoti. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jack Bostock |  Paul Alamoti |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.36Better | 0.19 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.79Better | 0.14 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.79Better | 0.33 |
| Points per Game | 1.4 | 2.0Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.36 | 0.52Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.57 | 3.19Better |
| Offloads per Game | 1.07 | 1.29Better |
| Possessions per Game | 24.0Better | 17.0 |
| Passes per Game | 5.3Better | 3.0 |
| Run Metres per Game | 144.5Better | 129.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 148.9Better | 132.0 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 46.4 | 48.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 17.3Better | 13.8 |
| Metres per Run | 8.36 | 9.40Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.38 | 9.25Better |
| Tackles per Game | 16.7Better | 13.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 84.8Better | 78.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.10Better | 0.22 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 86.7 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.08 | 0.06Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.3 | 0.5Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 1.0Better | 0.2 |
| Games played | 14 | 21 |