The verdict
Jack Bostock has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Jack Bostock leads by 20%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonJack Bostock20%of decided measures8measures wonJojo Fifita
Games played: 14 for Jack Bostock, 20 for Jojo Fifita. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jack Bostock |  Jojo Fifita |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.36 | 0.40Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.79Better | 0.20 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.79Better | 0.10 |
| Points per Game | 1.4 | 1.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.36 | 0.55Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.57Better | 2.55 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.07Better | 0.75 |
| Possessions per Game | 24.0Better | 16.8 |
| Passes per Game | 5.3Better | 4.8 |
| Run Metres per Game | 144.5Better | 108.2 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 148.9Better | 110.6 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 46.4Better | 40.3 |
| Runs per Game | 17.3Better | 10.7 |
| Metres per Run | 8.36 | 10.15Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.38 | 8.41Better |
| Tackles per Game | 16.7 | 17.9Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 84.8 | 85.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.10Better | 0.11 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.08 | 0.04Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 1.0Better | 0.2 |
| Games played | 14 | 20 |