The verdict
Latrell Mitchell has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Latrell Mitchell leads by 52%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
5measures wonIzack Tago52%of decided measures16measures wonLatrell Mitchell
Games played: 23 for Izack Tago, 11 for Latrell Mitchell. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Izack Tago |  Latrell Mitchell |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.13 | 1.09Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.13 | 0.82Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.22 | 1.64Better |
| Points per Game | 0.5 | 12.0Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.13 | 1.00Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.48 | 4.00Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.43 | 2.27Better |
| Possessions per Game | 8.8 | 26.6Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.9 | 10.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 60.9 | 110.4Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 62.3 | 285.5Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 21.0 | 38.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 6.7 | 10.3Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.09 | 10.74Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.21 | 8.76Better |
| Tackles per Game | 10.0Better | 8.5 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 86.8Better | 84.5 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.11Better | 0.12 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 61.7 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 80.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05Better | 0.06 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2Better | 0.1 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.1 | 0.4Better |
| Games played | 23 | 11 |