The verdict
Isaiya Katoa has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Isaiya Katoa leads by 40%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
14measures wonIsaiya Katoa40%of decided measures6measures wonLuke Metcalf
Games played: 20 for Isaiya Katoa, 10 for Luke Metcalf. Compared positions: Halfback.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Isaiya Katoa |  Luke Metcalf |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.10 | 0.20Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.80Better | 0.10 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.85Better | 0.20 |
| Points per Game | 0.5 | 2.0Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.80Better | 0.50 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.45Better | 0.00 |
| Possessions per Game | 58.3Better | 13.5 |
| Passes per Game | 37.8Better | 8.8 |
| Run Metres per Game | 50.5Better | 19.3 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 593.4Better | 113.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 13.0Better | 4.7 |
| Runs per Game | 7.2Better | 2.1 |
| Metres per Run | 7.01 | 9.19Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | – |
| Tackles per Game | 23.1Better | 5.8 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 86.5 | 86.6Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.11 | 0.10Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | 50.0 | 75.0Better |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01Better | 0.02 |
| Kicks per Game | 15.6Better | 2.8 |
| Kick Metres per Game | 543.1Better | 94.0 |
| Games played | 20 | 10 |