The verdict
Jojo Fifita has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Jojo Fifita leads by 5%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonHugo Savala5%of decided measures10measures wonJojo Fifita
Games played: 19 for Hugo Savala, 20 for Jojo Fifita. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.42Better | 0.40 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.53Better | 0.20 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.63Better | 0.10 |
| Points per Game | 2.2Better | 1.6 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.32 | 0.55Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.32 | 2.55Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.89Better | 0.75 |
| Possessions per Game | 21.2Better | 16.8 |
| Passes per Game | 11.4Better | 4.8 |
| Run Metres per Game | 74.7 | 108.2Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 89.6 | 110.6Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 25.8 | 40.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 8.6 | 10.7Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.65 | 10.15Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 6.89 | 8.41Better |
| Tackles per Game | 16.5 | 17.9Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 86.5Better | 85.4 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 66.7 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.04 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.1 | 0.2Better |
| Games played | 19 | 20 |