The verdict
Hugo Savala has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Hugo Savala leads by 40%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
14measures wonHugo Savala40%of decided measures6measures wonJack Howarth
Games played: 19 for Hugo Savala, 17 for Jack Howarth. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Hugo Savala |  Jack Howarth |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.42Better | 0.35 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.53Better | 0.18 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.63Better | 0.29 |
| Points per Game | 2.2Better | 1.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.32Better | 0.29 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.32 | 3.59Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.89Better | 0.59 |
| Possessions per Game | 21.2Better | 17.0 |
| Passes per Game | 11.4Better | 2.0 |
| Run Metres per Game | 74.7 | 126.4Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 89.6 | 128.4Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 25.8 | 44.6Better |
| Runs per Game | 8.6 | 14.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.65Better | 8.49 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 6.89 | 8.28Better |
| Tackles per Game | 16.5Better | 11.6 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 86.5Better | 79.2 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.11Better | 0.16 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 66.7 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.3Better | 0.1 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.1Better | 0.0 |
| Games played | 19 | 17 |