The verdict
Herbie Farnworth has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Herbie Farnworth leads by 90%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
19measures wonHerbie Farnworth90%of decided measures1measures wonJack Howarth
Games played: 23 for Herbie Farnworth, 17 for Jack Howarth. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Herbie Farnworth |  Jack Howarth |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.57Better | 0.35 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.30Better | 0.18 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.70Better | 0.29 |
| Points per Game | 2.3Better | 1.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.52Better | 0.29 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 5.87Better | 3.59 |
| Offloads per Game | 3.30Better | 0.59 |
| Possessions per Game | 22.4Better | 17.0 |
| Passes per Game | 5.1Better | 2.0 |
| Run Metres per Game | 162.3Better | 126.4 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 167.8Better | 128.4 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 63.7Better | 44.6 |
| Runs per Game | 17.0Better | 14.9 |
| Metres per Run | 9.54Better | 8.49 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 10.17Better | 8.28 |
| Tackles per Game | 15.4Better | 11.6 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 89.8Better | 79.2 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06Better | 0.16 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.03Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.4Better | 0.0 |
| Games played | 23 | 17 |